Colorado Community Corrections

Who Operates Community Corrections Programs

A unit of local government, the DOC, or any private individual, partnership, corporation, or association is authorized by law to operate a community corrections program (Section 17-27-102 (3), C.R.S.). There are 31 residential community corrections facilities in Colorado. Three community corrections programs are operated by units of local government: Mountain Parks Program at the Denver County Jail, Larimer County Community Corrections in Fort Collins, and Mesa County Community Corrections in Grand Junction. Two community corrections programs, Peer I Therapeutic Community Center and The Haven at Peer I, are operated by the State of Colorado via the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. The remaining 26 community corrections facilities are operated by private corporations or other private entities.

Community Corrections Facilities in Colorado

Four community corrections facilities offer specialized programs to deal with substance abusers, offenders who regress from community supervision, or inmates preparing for community placement. Peer I and The Haven (women only) at Peer I are therapeutic communities for substance abusers. The Residential Treatment Center in Greeley and San Luis Valley Community Corrections in Alamosa are both Community Intensive Residential Treatment (CIRT) facilities. Community corrections programs contract out for specialized services to treat other offenders such as sex offenders, mental health offenders, and domestic violence offenders.

Community Corrections Boards What role do community corrections boards play?

By statute, a community corrections board may be established by resolution or ordinance of a governing body or by a combination of governing bodies (Section 17-27-103, C.R.S.) In other words, locally-elected officials appoint community corrections board members. Community corrections boards may be advisory to the appointing governing body or may function independently of the governing body. There are 22 community corrections boards in the state, one in each judicial district.

Community corrections boards have the following authority:

  • to approve or disapprove the establishment and operation of a community corrections program;
  • to enter into contracts with the state of Colorado to provide services and supervision for offenders;
  • to accept or reject any offender referred for placement in a community corrections program under the jurisdiction of the board;
  • to receive grants from governmental and private sources and to receive court-authorized expense reimbursement related to community corrections programs;
  • to establish and enforce standards for the operation of a community corrections program;
  • to establish conditions or guidelines for the conduct of offenders placed in a community corrections program; and
  • to reject, after acceptance, the placement of any offender in a community corrections program and to provide an administrative review process for any offender who is rejected after acceptance by the board.

Community corrections programs operated by units of local government, state agencies, or nongovernmental agencies have similar authority to operate a community corrections program and to accept or reject inmates referred to the program. Because some community corrections programs are operated by boards and others are operated by local governments, in some cases community corrections boards have the authority to accept or reject offenders who have been referred for placement, and in other cases the facility makes that decision.

There are also cases in which this decision is made jointly by both entities. The level of involvement of boards and the authority delegated to programs varies from one judicial district to another. However, each offender referred to a community corrections program must be approved or rejected by the local community authority whether it be the community corrections board or the community corrections program.

This local control is considered a hallmark of Colorado’s community corrections program. Community corrections boards vary in size, makeup, philosophy, and degree of program control. This divergence in local control allows individual community corrections programs to offer specialized services and to accept or reject offenders based on the services offered by the program and the services needed by the offender. For instance, most community corrections facilities will not accept an offender needing intensive specialized drug treatment, but the Residential Treatment Center program in Greeley has an 81-bed drug treatment facility.

Role of the Division of Criminal Justice What is the role of the Division of Criminal Justice in community corrections?

The Division of Criminal Justice (DCJ) in the Department of Public Safety is responsible for administering and executing all contracts with units of local government, community corrections boards, or nongovernmental agencies for the provision of community corrections programs and services. In addition, the DCJ is responsible for the following:

  • establishing standards for community corrections programs which prescribe minimum levels of offender supervision and services, health and safety conditions of facilities, and other measures to ensure quality services;
  • auditing community corrections programs to determine levels of compliance with standards;
  • allocating state appropriations for community corrections to local community corrections boards and programs; and
  • providing technical assistance to community corrections boards, programs, and referring agencies.
Offenders Eligible for Community Corrections Placement How do offenders get into a community corrections program?

Offenders are placed in community corrections programs via a complex referral process. There are two basic types of offenders in community corrections programs: those who are diverted from a sentence to prison, and those who transition from a DOC facility into the community. All offenders in community corrections programs, both diversion and transition offenders, must be approved for acceptance into a facility by the local community corrections program or board.

Both diversion and transition referrals come from three main sources:

  • Under state law, a District Court judge may refer any offender convicted of a felony to a community corrections program unless the offender is required to be sentenced to prison for a violent crime. The District Court sentences offenders directly to a community corrections program as an alternative to a sentence to prison. Occasionally, the District Court sentences an offender directly to community corrections as a condition of probation.
  • Department of Corrections Case Managers identify eligible DOC inmates for referral to a community corrections program. DOC case managers submit referrals to the Division of Community Corrections in the DOC. Non-violent inmates are referred by DOC case managers for placement in community corrections 19 months prior to the parole eligibility date (PED) and violent offenders are referred nine months prior to the PED. Case managers decide to which community corrections program or board the referral should be submitted. The division places non-violent offenders in a community corrections facility 16 months prior to the PED and violent offenders are placed six months prior to the PED.
  • The Colorado Board of Parole may refer a parolee to a community corrections program for placement in a facility either as a condition of parole, as a modification of the conditions of parole, or upon temporary revocation of parole.

Because of this complex referral system, there are several types of offenders in community corrections facilities or programs:

  • residential diversion offenders – these offenders are sentenced by the District Court to serve all or a portion of their sentence in a community corrections facility;
  • residential transition offenders – these offenders are DOC inmates who have been referred by the DOC for a placement in a community corrections facility as a transition period back into the community;
  • condition of probation offenders (residential) – these offenders are sentenced by the District Court to probation but are required to serve a portion of their sentence to probation in a community corrections facility as a condition of their probation;
  • transition parole offenders (residential) – these parolees are either in a community corrections facility as a condition of parole, or have been placed in a community corrections facility by the parole officer for stabilization because they appear to be in danger of revocation;
  • nonresidential diversion – these offenders who were sentenced to community corrections have been transferred from residential status to nonresidential status after completing the residential program (such as drug treatment) to which they were sentenced. While on nonresidential status they typically report to a day-reporting center or a drug testing center.
  • nonresidential transition – these parolees have been transferred from residential status to nonresidential status after completing the residential program they were ordered to complete. While on nonresidential status they report to either a day-reporting program or to some other treatment program.
  • DOC Intensive Supervision Program – these are DOC inmates who have no more than 180 days remaining until their parole eligibility date. These inmates are most likely to be released on parole by the parole board and are on intensive supervision such as electronic monitoring and home detention while awaiting an appearance before the board.
Client Reviews
"Mr. Steinberg provided my family with expert handling of my son's case. He took extra time understand the case, to consult with us during the pretrial proceedings, and to support him for a plea agreement. Mr. Steinberg is very knowledge about the law and very professional. He guided us in achieving the best possible outcome for my son. If I am ever in need of law services again, I will certainly have Mr. Steinberg handle my case. l also highly recommend his services to anyone that might be in need of an excellent defense attorney!" Tanya Witt
"I found myself in criminal trouble, that I wasn't guilty of and thanks to Mr. Steinberg's dedication and hard work, right before we we're looking at having to continue on to trial level Mr. Steinberg was able to use his vast knowledge of the law and his many respected years in the system to find a way to show my innocence. After a very unsure and somewhat difficult time for me, this very skilled and knowledgeable attorney was able to find the right path to take to reach a dismissal in my case. For that I can't tell you how much I appreciate his representation and his excellent understanding and helpful personality. He's a great man and an even better attorney but don't misunderstand him, he is an attorney not a therapist. Thanks H." Josh
"Working with Michael Steinberg was a wonderful experience. Truly people need to know that he is a expert in what he does. His personality is compassionate, intellectual, and down to earth. I glean that Michael is fun to be around. In the time I worked with him, it was a pleasure to be around him. As for my case, the outcome was amazing and couldn’t be better. He has made my life more manageable because of the outcome of my case. I’ve worked with other lawyers in the Denver area. He is superior to them all. If you’re in need of a lawyer and you come across Mr. Steinberg look no further he’s going to be the one you need. Thank you again Michael." Renee Taylor
Mr. Steinberg, It has been an honor working with you. I very much appreciated your style, demeanor, patience, and determination. I was well instructed in every step of the court process, and I felt that I received excellent guidance and timely information regarding my case. You have been extremely thoughtful with your time, and I was very impressed with your sensitivity in responding to my requests. Thank you. Anonymous