Attacking a Colorado Criminal Arrest Warrant – The Veracity Hearing

I ntroduction -This web page will discuss a Colorado attack on an Arrest Warrant for lack of probable cause – and seeking a dismissal of the case on the base that the arrest warrant allegedly contained false statements which must be stricken under the standards of Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978)

The Law

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution proscribes the issuance of any warrant except upon probable cause.

A defendant may challenge and have stricken a false statement contained in a warrant in a “veracity proceeding” by alleging and establishing by a preponderance of evidence each of the following:

  1. a good faith basis in fact for the challenge, based on affidavits submitted in support of the motion to suppress,
  2. [which] set forth with specificity the ‘precise statements challenged,’
  3. [and] establish at the veracity hearing that there are false statements in the affidavit, and
  4. establish that the false statements were the product of ‘intentional falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth’ by ‘the officer-affiant’ ….”
No Veracity Hearing Unless the Statement is Essential to Probable Cause Finding

The court need not conduct a veracity hearing unless:

“the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause, and suppression is to occur only if the defendant proves perjury or reckless disregard and it then appears that with the affidavit’s false material set to one side, the affidavit’s remaining content is insufficient to establish probable cause

Analysis of the Veracity Process in Colorado

The Court must find that the Defendant has satisfied the initial two-part requirement for a Veracity Hearing. A good faith showing must be made to the Court to permit the Court to conclude that there are false statements in the Affidavit for Arrest and that these statements are not only necessary to, but are a vital sine qua non to any finding of probable cause against Defendant.

Absent the statements there can be no probable cause for the commission of the crimes charged and applying the above analysis the Court must conclude that the statements must be stricken from the Affidavit for the Arrest.

In the absence of the stricken statements if and when there is a finding of no probable cause for Defendant’s arrest for any of the crimes charges there is then an inadequate factual basis for the arrest and no probable cause for any of the charged crimes. Therefore the charges must be DISMISSED.

Client Reviews
"Mr. Steinberg provided my family with expert handling of my son's case. He took extra time understand the case, to consult with us during the pretrial proceedings, and to support him for a plea agreement. Mr. Steinberg is very knowledge about the law and very professional. He guided us in achieving the best possible outcome for my son. If I am ever in need of law services again, I will certainly have Mr. Steinberg handle my case. l also highly recommend his services to anyone that might be in need of an excellent defense attorney!" Tanya Witt
"I found myself in criminal trouble, that I wasn't guilty of and thanks to Mr. Steinberg's dedication and hard work, right before we we're looking at having to continue on to trial level Mr. Steinberg was able to use his vast knowledge of the law and his many respected years in the system to find a way to show my innocence. After a very unsure and somewhat difficult time for me, this very skilled and knowledgeable attorney was able to find the right path to take to reach a dismissal in my case. For that I can't tell you how much I appreciate his representation and his excellent understanding and helpful personality. He's a great man and an even better attorney but don't misunderstand him, he is an attorney not a therapist. Thanks H." Josh
"Working with Michael Steinberg was a wonderful experience. Truly people need to know that he is a expert in what he does. His personality is compassionate, intellectual, and down to earth. I glean that Michael is fun to be around. In the time I worked with him, it was a pleasure to be around him. As for my case, the outcome was amazing and couldn’t be better. He has made my life more manageable because of the outcome of my case. I’ve worked with other lawyers in the Denver area. He is superior to them all. If you’re in need of a lawyer and you come across Mr. Steinberg look no further he’s going to be the one you need. Thank you again Michael." Renee Taylor
Mr. Steinberg, It has been an honor working with you. I very much appreciated your style, demeanor, patience, and determination. I was well instructed in every step of the court process, and I felt that I received excellent guidance and timely information regarding my case. You have been extremely thoughtful with your time, and I was very impressed with your sensitivity in responding to my requests. Thank you. Anonymous