Close Free Consultation:
Tap Here to Call Us

Anti Racial Profiling Laws in Colorado

by H. Michael Steinberg Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer – Against Profiling and Defending Against Bias Based Arrests and Prosecutions

In Colorado racial profiling has become a practice of law enforcement practice that attacks at the core of the fundamental principles of the Constitution. Profiling does not target the acts of the criminal – it targets only people of color for investigation.

Law enforcement, in pursuing racial profiling in Colorado and across the nation, have lost the trust of the very people they are sworn to protect and serve. This practice has led countless people to live in fear and has created a system that casts entire communities as suspect.

Colorado has recently enacted anti-racial profiling laws. They are gathered and reprinted below. H. Michael Steinberg submits that knowledge is power and power can prevent wrongs. There are times when good people make bad choices – racial profiling however can unfairly ensnare the innocent.

24-31-309 – Profiling – Officer Identification – Training
    1. The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that profiling is a practice that presents a great danger to the fundamental principles of our constitutional republic and is abhorrent and cannot be tolerated.
    2. The general assembly further finds and declares that motorists who have been stopped by peace officers for no reason other than the color of their skin or their apparent race, ethnicity, age, or gender are the victims of discriminatory practices.
    3. The general assembly further finds and declares that Colorado peace officers risk their lives every day. The people of Colorado greatly appreciate the hard work and dedication of peace officers in protecting public safety. The good name of these peace officers should not be tarnished by the actions of those who commit discriminatory practices.
    4. It is therefore the intent of the general assembly in adopting this section to provide a means of identification of peace officers who are engaging in profiling, to underscore the accountability of those peace officers for their actions, and to provide training to those peace officers on how to avoid profiling.
  1. For purposes of this section, “profiling” means the practice of detaining a suspect based on race, ethnicity, age, or gender without the existence of any individualized suspicion of the particular person being stopped.
  2. Any peace officer certified pursuant to this part 3 shall not engage in profiling.
    1. A peace officer certified pursuant to this part 3 shall provide, without being asked, his or her business card to any person whom the peace officer has detained in a traffic stop, but has not cited or arrested. The business card shall include identifying information about the peace officer including, but not limited to, the peace officer’s name, division, precinct, and badge or other identification number and a telephone number that may be used, if necessary, to report any comments, positive or negative, regarding the traffic stop.The identity of the reporting person and the report of any such comments that constitutes a complaint shall initially be kept confidential by the receiving law enforcement agency, to the extent permitted by law. The receiving law enforcement agency shall be permitted to obtain some identifying information regarding the complaint to allow initial processing of the complaint. If it becomes necessary for the further processing of the complaint for the complainant to disclose his or her identity, the complainant shall do so or, at the option of the receiving law enforcement agency, the complaint may be dismissed.
    2. The provisions of paragraph (a) of this subsection (4) shall not apply to authorized undercover operations conducted by any law enforcement agency.
    3. Each law enforcement agency in the state shall compile on at least an annual basis any information derived from telephone calls received due to the distribution of business cards as described in paragraph (a) of this subsection (4) and that allege profiling. The agency shall make such information available to the public but shall not include the names of peace officers or the names of persons alleging profiling in such information. The agency may also include in such information the costs to the agency of complying with the provisions of this subsection (4).
  3. The training provided for peace officers shall include an examination of the patterns, practices, and protocols that result in profiling and prescribe patterns, practices, and protocols that prevent profiling. On or before August 1, 2001, the P.O.S.T. board shall certify the curriculum for such training.
  4. No later than six months after the effective date of this section, each law enforcement agency in the state shall have written policies, procedures, and training in place that are specifically designed to address profiling. Each peace officer employed by such law enforcement agency shall receive such training. The written policies and procedures shall be made available to the public for inspection during regular business hours.

Source: L. 2001: Entire section added, p. 934, § 2, effective June 5.

42-4-115 – Information on Traffic Law Enforcement – Collection – Profiling – Annual Report – Repeal
  1. The Colorado state patrol and any law enforcement agency performing traffic stops that serves the city and county of Denver shall collect and maintain the following information regarding each traffic stop:
    1. The number of persons detained for routine traffic infractions and whether a citation or warning was issued as a result of the traffic stop;
    2. Identifying characteristics of the persons detained during the traffic stop, including race or ethnicity, age, and gender;
    3. The approximate date, time, and location of the traffic stop;
    4. The reason for the traffic stop;
    5. Whether a search of the person occurred as a result of the traffic stop;
    6. Whether, as a result of the traffic stop, the person’s vehicle or personal effects or the vehicle’s driver or passengers were searched and the race or ethnicity, age, and gender of any person searched;
    7. Whether the search was conducted pursuant to consent, probable cause, or reasonable suspicion to suspect a crime;
    8. Whether any contraband was found as a result of the traffic stop;
    9. Whether an arrest was made as a result of the traffic stop; and
    10. Whether any property was seized as a result of the traffic stop.
  2. othing in this section shall be construed to require the collection and maintenance of information in connection with roadblocks, vehicle checks, or checkpoints, except when such traffic stops result in a warning, search, seizure, or arrest.
  3. Beginning January 1, 2002, and continuing through January 1, 2004, the Colorado state patrol and any law enforcement agency performing traffic stops that serves the city and county of Denver shall annually compile the information gathered pursuant to subsection (1) of this section and shall make such information available to the public.
  4. This section is repealed, effective January 1, 2004.

Source: L. 2001: Entire section added, p. 933, § 1, effective June 5.


Practice Areas
Client Reviews
★★★★★
"Mr. Steinberg provided my family with expert handling of my son's case. He took extra time understand the case, to consult with us during the pretrial proceedings, and to support him for a plea agreement. Mr. Steinberg is very knowledge about the law and very professional. He guided us in achieving the best possible outcome for my son. If I am ever in need of law services again, I will certainly have Mr. Steinberg handle my case. l also highly recommend his services to anyone that might be in need of an excellent defense attorney!" Tanya Witt
★★★★★
"I found myself in criminal trouble, that I wasn't guilty of and thanks to Mr. Steinberg's dedication and hard work, right before we we're looking at having to continue on to trial level Mr. Steinberg was able to use his vast knowledge of the law and his many respected years in the system to find a way to show my innocence. After a very unsure and somewhat difficult time for me, this very skilled and knowledgeable attorney was able to find the right path to take to reach a dismissal in my case. For that I can't tell you how much I appreciate his representation and his excellent understanding and helpful personality. He's a great man and an even better attorney but don't misunderstand him, he is an attorney not a therapist. Thanks H." Josh
★★★★★
"Working with Michael Steinberg was a wonderful experience. Truly people need to know that he is a expert in what he does. His personality is compassionate, intellectual, and down to earth. I glean that Michael is fun to be around. In the time I worked with him, it was a pleasure to be around him. As for my case, the outcome was amazing and couldn’t be better. He has made my life more manageable because of the outcome of my case. I’ve worked with other lawyers in the Denver area. He is superior to them all. If you’re in need of a lawyer and you come across Mr. Steinberg look no further he’s going to be the one you need. Thank you again Michael." Renee Taylor
★★★★★
Mr. Steinberg, It has been an honor working with you. I very much appreciated your style, demeanor, patience, and determination. I was well instructed in every step of the court process, and I felt that I received excellent guidance and timely information regarding my case. You have been extremely thoughtful with your time, and I was very impressed with your sensitivity in responding to my requests. Thank you. Anonymous
Contact Us